You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of retinal thickness and blood flow parameters in macular area between healthy group and SLE group

From: Application of SS-OCTA to evaluate the effects of long-term hydroxychloroquine treatment on retinal structure and microcirculation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OCT parameter

Health group (n = 21)

Baseline group (n = 21)

Low-risk group (n = 23)

High-risk group (n = 29)

F

P-value

P1

P2

P3

P4

P5

P6

Inner retinal membrane thickness(µm)

            

Central fovea

61.33 ± 1.40

59.43 ± 5.79

57.96 ± 8.20

45.93 ± 7.15

26.994

0.000*

0.372

0.107

0.000*

0.480

0.000*

0.000*

Paracentral fovea

119.45 ± 1.09

118.21 ± 4.37

118.02 ± 6.19

111.42 ± 4.50

13.135

0.000*

0.438

0.359

0.000*

0.902

0.000*

0.000*

Surrounding area

113.04 ± 0.99

113.49 ± 4.55

112.01 ± 5.44

108.06 ± 4.49

7.360

0.000*

0.754

0.468

0.000 *

0.296

0.000*

0.003*

Outer omentum thickness(µm)

            

Central fovea

218.71 ± 9.05

212.95 ± 6.16

214.74 ± 8.24

215.41 ± 7.85

1.958

0.126

0.020

0.099

0.148

0.455

0.280

0.760

Paracentral fovea

225.96 ± 9.68

217.68 ± 8.96

219.28 ± 10.13

221.50 ± 7.03

3.468

0.019

0.003*

0.015

0.083

0.552

0.137

0.374

Surrounding area

199.74 ± 7.95

191.35 ± 8.31

195.30 ± 8.53

195.54 ± 6.12

4.198

0.008*

0.001*

0.059

0.059

0.091

0.059

0.911

Full thickness of omentum(µm)

            

Central fovea

254.38 ± 8.16

255.29 ± 6.97

254.04 ± 9.75

247.34 ± 9.63

4.550

0.005*

0.740

0.899

0.006*

0.642

0.002*

0.008*

Paracentral fovea

334.45 ± 10.08

335.60 ± 9.40

331.61 ± 11.38

332.97 ± 7.39

0.738

0.532

0.677

0.326

0.590

0.169

0.340

0.609

Surrounding area

296.57 ± 7.68

298.87 ± 8.96

296.37 ± 7.02

298.50 ± 5.56

0.724

0.540

0.307

0.927

0.356

0.257

0.859

0.296

SCP-VD (%)

            

Central fovea

31.00 (29.00,32.50)

28.00 (27.00,30.00)

28.00 (27.00,31.00)

21.00 (15.00,23.00)

37.517

0.000b*

0.203

0.045

0.000*

0.470

0.000*

0.000*

temporal side of the inner circle

42.62 ± 2.52

41.57 ± 3.49

42.43 ± 2.68

40.41 ± 3.22

2.870

0.041

0.263

0.840

0.012*

0.345

0.184

0.018

above the inner ring

44.05 ± 2.31

43.19 ± 4.08

43.57 ± 2.19

41.72 ± 2.71

3.126

0.030

0.339

0.582

0.006*

0.668

0.080

0.025

nasal side of the inner ring

42.33 ± 2.58

43.19 ± 2.32

42.83 ± 2.35

41.97 ± 2.67

1.137

0.339

0.269

0.515

0.608

0.630

0.090

0.220

below the inner ring

44.48 ± 2.54

42.19 ± 4.59

43.78 ± 2.76

41.83 ± 4.12

2.849

0.042

0.045

0.530

0.013

0.151

0.729

0.058

temporal side of the outer ring

44.14 ± 2.78

42.67 ± 2.63

42.96 ± 2.88

41.03 ± 2.80

5.349

0.002*

0.089

0.161

0.000*

0.730

0.043

0.015

above the outer ring

45.81 ± 1.83

44.90 ± 2.77

44.74 ± 2.49

43.24 ± 2.64

4.691

0.004*

0.240

0.156

0.000*

0.825

0.021

0.033

nasal side of the outer ring

45.43 ± 1.91

43.71 ± 2.61

44.52 ± 2.04

43.31 ± 3.19

3.172

0.028

0.032

0.242

0.005*

0.297

0.582

0.092

below the outer ring

44.76 ± 2.34

42.43 ± 4.43

43.52 ± 3.31

42.41 ± 4.16

2.050

0.113

0.044

0.269

0.029

0.330

0.989

0.286

FAZ area(mm²)

0.24 ± 0.07

0.25 ± 0.07

0.30 ± 0.09

0.47 ± 0.08

50.255

0.000*

0.705

0.013

0.000*

0.034

0.000*

0.000*

FAZ circumference(mm)

1.93 ± 0.34

1.95 ± 0.25

2.04 ± 0.48

2.85 ± 0.49

30.130

0.000*

0.900

0.396

0.000*

0.472

0.000*

0.000*

  1. Note: P represents the comparison among three groups.; P1 represents the comparison between the healthy group and the baseline group. P2 represents the comparison between healthy group and low-risk group. P3 represents the comparison between healthy group and high-risk group. P4 represents the comparison between baseline group and low-risk group. P5 represents the comparison between baseline group and high-risk group. P6 represents the comparison between low-risk group and high-risk group. *Using Bonferroni correction, P < 0.0125 indicates statistically significant differences. In comparisons between groups, b indicates the use of the Kruskal-Wallis H non-parametric test; otherwise, Anova analysis was applied. LSD-t test was used for comparison between the two groups